1. On September 5, 201, Plaintiff C’s obligation to the Defendant under a loan transaction agreement does not exist.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant and G status and the relationship between G and the Plaintiffs 1) Defendant were non-profit corporations established based on the Credit Union Act for the purposes of credit business, such as the receipt of deposits and installment savings, loans to members, etc., and mutual aid business for members from the members of the association. G was promoted by the chief of the division around March 1991 after entering the Defendant from around March 191, and around January 201, the head of the division was promoted from around October 201 to around October 201, and was in charge of the duties of guiding and supervising the employees in charge of the loan and the receipt and receipt and receipt and payment personnel of the customers. (2) Plaintiff A and C are the relatives of Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff D is the head of Plaintiff C, the head of Plaintiff C, and Plaintiff E is the mother of Plaintiff C.

B. The Plaintiff A paid money under his own name as a deposit to G 1) The Plaintiff F New Cooperatives with G head H designated by G for the purpose of deposit to the Defendant (this case is the Defendant, but when the account is referred to as “FFF”.

(2) On June 18, 200, the account (I and J’s account) transferred KRW 20,000,000 on June 18, 2009, and KRW 5,000 on June 19, 200, and KRW 19,000 on June 19, 200. However, although the above money was not deposited to the Defendant, G opened and issued a bank account under the name of the Plaintiff as if it was normally deposited the above money, and opened the bank account, opened and issued the above bank account, printed the account number, contract date, contract amount, maturity rate, etc. to the Plaintiff, printed the account number, contract date, maturity, interest rate, etc. to the Plaintiff through the above bank, and then issued this passbook to the Plaintiff using the above bank contact, and then entered false contents in the above method more than three times as indicated in Table 1 No. 1, and then delivered it to the Plaintiff under the name of the Plaintiff’s personal cooperation (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s personal compromise”).