Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a cruise vehicle.

On November 30, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 06:00, and driven the road of three lanes in front of the E pharmacy in Daejeon, Daejeon, along the two-lane speed from the fourth distance to the fourth parallel, at about 71-73km in speed.

At the time, it is a new wall and there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, so the driver had a duty of care to live the front door well, reduce speed, and drive safely according to the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to change the vehicle driving signal to the stop signal, and neglected to proceed as it was, and thereby, received the victim F (62 3) who dried the crosswalk from the right side of the Defendant to the left side of the crosswalk from the Defendant’s front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim by occupational negligence at the Jung-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City, Jung-gu, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City on November 30, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. A death certificate;

1. Application of the C Blue video CD laws and regulations

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following extenuating circumstances in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of the said Act is that the Defendant, while driving a motor vehicle, neglected his/her duty to take the front-time care of the motor vehicle, but it was unreasonable to enter the intersection even though it was a yellow signal, and caused the victim's death by shocking the victim who was walking on the crosswalk, and the crime of this case is not good. However, the Defendant is the first offender with no criminal history, and the victim's bereaved family members are agreed to do so.