logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2015.10.14 2015고정198
건설산업기본법위반
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is an employee of Dong-dong Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Dong-dong Construction"), and Defendant B is a representative director of the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "F"), who is engaged in construction business.

1. Notwithstanding that a person who has contracted or executed construction works by using the name or trade name of another constructor, or has not lent a construction business registration certificate or construction business registration pocket book, the accused shall:

A. A. On November 2012, 2012, at the office of the H company located in the 1st floor G, the H company requested the said I to lend the H company’s license, and the H company received the passbook and the employee reduction from the H company. On January 9, 2013, the H company entered into a subcontract on the “J Civil Works Works”-related subcontract with the Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun.

B. On January 9, 2013, the first police officer requested L to lend F’s license to F’s above B at the F Office located in K, which was entrusted by the Defendant, and the F’s corporate passbook and employee reduction was issued, and the F’s corporate passbook and employee reduction was concluded on January 9, 2013, and the said construction was performed after concluding a subcontract agreement with the Kudong Construction Co., Ltd. related to the said civil works.

2. Although Defendant B had another person receive or execute construction works using his/her name or trade name or lent his/her construction business registration certificate or construction business registration pocket book to another person, the Defendant was requested on January 9, 2013 to lend F’s license from L, which he/she was delegated by the above A at the F Office located in K at the first time of the first day of the first day of the first day of the first day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the first day of the second day of the first day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second

The defendant, as a constructor, lent a construction business registration certificate to A.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Part of each prosecutor's protocol of interrogation of the defendant against the defendant.

arrow