logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2021.02.08 2020고정286
청소년보호법위반
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a business proprietor operating a general restaurant called "C" in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-nam.

No person shall sell, lend, distribute, or provide free of charge drugs, etc. harmful to juveniles to juveniles.

Nevertheless, at around 22:30 on August 21, 2020, the Defendant sold alcoholic beverages equivalent to the sum of KRW 126,000 and alcoholic beverages equivalent to KRW 126,00, such as 7 bottles, beer, 6 bottles, and beer beer, without verifying the identification card of 9 juveniles, such as D (17 years of age, South) a juvenile, and so on.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of each police officer against the defendant or D;

1. Written statements of D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, and L;

1. On-site photographs (C outside and inside), receipts, oral photographs, photographs of resident registration certificates (M);

1. The defendant and his defense counsel provided an adult identification card at the time when D was recorded in the previous restaurant of this case, and the defendant believed that D was an adult, and thereafter made a visit with D, and there was no awareness of the fact that the customer of this case was a juvenile, as long as D was believed to be an adult, as he did not know that the customer of this case was a juvenile as he believed to be a juvenile.

The argument is asserted.

However, at the time of the presentation of the identity card stolen from D by the Defendant himself, the Defendant made a somewhat different doubt about the photograph and real object.

Even if they were to the extent (60 pages of investigation records), the Defendant did not proceed to the additional identification verification procedure, such as allowing D to open a resident registration number.

Although the number of juveniles working in the instant case was nine, the Defendant did not have attempted to verify the identification card to the rest of juveniles except D.

In full view of these facts and circumstances, as the defendant is able to be recognized as willful negligence, the above assertion by the defendant and the defense counsel is not accepted.

Application of Statutes

1. Criminal facts;

arrow