Text
1.(a)
Defendant G, within the scope of each money ordered by Defendant D, E, F and each of the following 2. paragraphs, respectively, and Plaintiff G.
Reasons
1. Claim against Defendant G
A. (1) The facts of recognition (1) Defendant G acquired a site ownership among the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) along with the other Defendants of this case and Nonparty H, and obtained a favorable judgment to the effect that the following was rendered on August 17, 2012 by filing a lawsuit for purchase claim under Article 7 of the Act on the Ownership and Ownership of Aggregate Buildings (Seoul East Eastern District Court 201Gahap6579) against the Plaintiffs and Nonparty I, the owner of the section of exclusive ownership listed in the same list as the site ownership.
① At the same time, Plaintiff A, B, C, and Nonparty I received the amount corresponding to the items indicated below from the Defendants and H, and simultaneously implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership on the ground of sale as of January 26, 2012 for Plaintiff A, Plaintiff B, and C, and Nonparty I’s shares in the attached list, 5/25 shares, and 8/25 shares in the attached list, respectively, to Defendant D, E, F, and H, and 1/2 shares in relation to the 8/25 shares, respectively.
A CID 11,130,00 won 7,950,00 won 7,950,000 won 7,950,000 won E 11,130,000 won 7,950,950,000 won 6,50,500 won 6,509,880 won 11,130,000 won 7,950,000 won 7,950,950,000 won 6,509,880 won 11,130,950,000 won 7,950,000 won 7,950,000 won 6,50,000 won 7,50,809,80, 809, 301, 208, 306, 305, 2008, respectively, of this case
(2) The Defendant G and the Plaintiffs agreed to the following purport on November 201, 201, when they were dissatisfied with the above judgment and were pending in the appellate trial.
Defendants and H are up to December 6, 2012.