logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.20 2015고단7343
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On November 25, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the support of Suwon Friwon, and was sentenced to special amnesty, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Child Training Correctional Institution on August 14, 2015.

【Criminal facts】 The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving the B Kaz.

On October 26, 2015, at around 22:20, the Defendant, a five-lane road in front of Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, was proceeding along three-lanes from the remote distance protection area of the scam, to the new distance protection area of the forest.

Since there is a place where a signal light and crosswalk are installed, it was confirmed whether a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive according to the new code, after checking whether there is a person who will cut the road by reducing the speed and by properly examining the right and the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, when the defendant neglected this and proceeded with the stop signal while disregarding the change of the vehicle driving signal to the stop signal, the defendant taken the victim D(W, 55 years old) and E(44 years old) crossing the crosswalk according to the victim's signals into the front part of the above vans, and caused the above victims to go against the victim F(73 years old).

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by the above occupational negligence, the injury to the victim E, such as the bend of the right fel group in need of approximately six weeks of treatment, injury to the victim D such as knee-fele-fele-fele-feel-feel-feel-feel-feel-feel-feel-feas, etc., and on the part of the victim F where approximately two weeks of treatment is required, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of each traffic accident in the F, D, and E;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. A traffic accident report and a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Previous conviction: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of inquiry about criminal history;

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning criminal facts.

arrow