The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant of mistake of facts only sent the victim’s hand to the Defendant’s breath by breathing the breath, and then did not depict the victim’s hand as indicated in the facts charged.

B. Even if facts charged are recognized, the Defendant’s act is merely a passive resistance, and thus, the illegality should be avoided as it constitutes self-defense.

C. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (three million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit, as stated in the facts charged, since it is sufficiently recognized that the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim.

1) From the investigative agency to the court of the court below, the victim consistently stated to the effect that “the defendant was aware of his mother’s her mother’s her fry and had a fry dispute with the defendant, but the defendant had his fry and had his fryd with his fry,” and that “the defendant was faced with his fying the head by pushing his fying his fys, but the defendant was pushed down with his fys.” At the time of the instant case, D directly observed from the beginning that the defendant and the victim fyed his fys at the time of the instant case, from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below, “The victim fyed the victim by misunderstanding that the victim fys the mother of the defendant, and the defendant fyed his fys at the time of fying,” and the victim was fying the victim, and the victim was fying

In that situation, it is thought that fighting has been completed, and the sound was string, so the victim was in excess of the reeded field.

The defendant is not a victim.