The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the wife B, and the victim C is the business owner of the DNA store.

At around 22:30 on January 11, 2020, the Defendant: (a) divided the two-way disease on the floor by her husband’s drinking two-way at the Dju shop operated by the victim in Cheongju-si, U.S., the Defendant interfered with the victim’s DNA business by force, such as: (b) cutting off the two-way disease on the floor; (c) throwing off the table on the floor; and (d) taking away the container and the victim’s desire; and (c) taking around about 20 minutes of the disturbance, the Defendant took advantage of the victim’s influence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol on the defendant's statement C in court;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Penalty of one million won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (including the fact that the suspension of sentence is recognized as a criminal act, that there is no record of criminal punishment, and that there are some other circumstances that may be taken into account the circumstances of the crime) is more than