1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance is as follows: “The contract for the operation of dredging soil storage facilities (hereinafter “instant storage facilities”) was entered into for the operation of dredging soil storage facilities (hereinafter “the instant storage facilities”)”; “Defendant Central Lebcon Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Central Lebcon”)” in the 3th page 12 column “Defendant Central Lebcon Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Central Lebcon”)” (hereinafter “Defendant Central Co., Ltd.”), respectively; and “Defendant Central Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Central Co., Ltd.”) from 4th to 5th Had Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Central Co., Ltd.”); and “Defendant Central Co., Ltd.”) from 5th Had Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Central Co., Ltd.”), from 5th Hadon 5th Hadon 5th Hadon 6th 7th Hadon 7th Hadon 6th 4th Hadon”).

2. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, from the 4th to 5th 2th 2th Ha, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, i.e., the agreement on the operation of the storage facilities of this case between the Plaintiff and the Defendant Chungcheongnam-si, is a mixed agreement on the sale and purchase of dredging soil and the operation of the storage facilities. As the contract on the operation of the storage facilities terminated on May 7, 2014, the part of the contract on the operation of the storage facilities was revoked around that time. Since the dredging soil remaining in the storage facilities of this case at the time of such cancellation is 265,350 cubic meters, and the dredging soil remains in 2,125 meters per cubic metres of dredging soil, the price per 2,125 meters per cubic metres (563,868,750 won) multiplied by the said amount (hereinafter “the claimed amount”), the Plaintiff did not change the claim amount from the first instance to 314,016,7500

Defendant 2.