A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 01:20 on January 20, 2013, the Defendant was demanded to comply with the drinking alcohol measurement by inserting the breathro vehicle in front of the “new bomb bomb bomb bomb,” which is located in the Jinsung-dong Police Station D Zone D District District, by the Defendant, from the police officer belonging to the Jinsung-dong Police Station, and making it possible for the Defendant to be deemed to have driven under the influence of alcohol, such as a breath and a breath of walking, and a breath of walking, and a breath of walking on the face.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not go against the demand of a police officer for the measurement of drinking without a justifiable reason because the Defendant did not go against the demand of a police officer for the measurement of drinking.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is C C C C C’s owner of a passenger car.

The Defendant operated a car without mandatory insurance at the same time and place as the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Mandatory insurance policies;

1. A report on the actual status of a host driver;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act which choose a penalty, and Articles 46 (2) 2 and 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act to attend lectures;