A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 24, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year by imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents at the Gwangju District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 24, 2017.

1. The accused is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle BM3 vehicle in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving), and a violation of the Road Traffic Act;

On September 22, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car without a driver's license on September 22, 2017, and driven the D front road in C at the time of the week along one-lane from the opposite north north north apartment at the speed of about 5km per hour.

At the time, the central line is installed as a sub-line, so in such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to not exceed the central line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and received the front part of the victim E (50 years old) driving, which was driving in the direction of the two-lanes from the opposite side of the opposite apartment of the U.S., along the two-lanes from the opposite side of the opposite apartment of the U.S., with the front part of the said vehicle as the rear wheels of the said vehicle.

As a result, Defendant Appellant’s negligence caused the above victim’s injury to sugars requiring approximately two weeks’ medical treatment, chills and tensions, and tensions and tensions, and at the same time damaged Defendant Appellant’s repair cost to cover KRW 600,000.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which has not purchased mandatory insurance;

The Defendant operated the said BM3 car without purchasing mandatory insurance at the same time and place as paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Evidence and photographs of the traffic accident;

1. The driver's license ledger (A);

1. Inquiry into mandatory insurance (B);

1. A written diagnosis and a written estimate of damage ozones;

1. The point of judgment is that of a previous offense;