1. The Defendant’s disposition of non-permission on December 18, 2019 regarding the perusal of each of the documents listed in the list (attached Form 1) to the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff’s criminal appeal and non-prosecution disposition 1) Defendant B was the representative director of D Co., Ltd.

Around July 5, 2012, the respondent entered into a contract with the Japanese FF company with D Co., Ltd. located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul. F Co., Ltd. to import assembly-type housing from F Co., Ltd. and make it possible to pay money to the father who received assembly-type housing from F Co., Ltd., and received it from G G in Gangnam-gu, Seoul.

The phrase “a request to borrow KRW 65 million” was false.

However, in fact, the suspect did not have the intent or ability to repay even if he borrowed money to the plaintiff.

Nevertheless, as seen above, the suspect deceivings the Plaintiff, and that deceivings the Plaintiff, received KRW 15 million from the Plaintiff on June 22, 2012, and deposited KRW 50 million in the above account on July 5, 2012, and received KRW 65 million in total.

2) On June 25, 2013, when the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the suspect B as described in the foregoing paragraph 1 at a place where it is not known to C, the suspect C of the suspected crime against C, prepared a written confirmation of “if C fails to pay by November 31, 2013, KRW 65 million borrowed from H, the husband of the Plaintiff, B, the husband of the Plaintiff, to transfer 5% of I shares to H”, and issued a written confirmation to the Plaintiff.

However, the suspect C had no intention or ability to transfer I's shares even if the plaintiff withdraws the complaint.

Nevertheless, the suspect deceiving the plaintiff and made the plaintiff withdraw the complaint against the suspect B.

In 2019, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against B and C on the charge of fraud with the following content:

On November 27, 2019, the public prosecutor of the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office (hereinafter referred to as the "Public Prosecutor's Office") issued a non-prosecution disposition with no suspicion due to insufficient evidence, and C excluded from the contents of the complaint.

“On the ground that the dismissal did not take a disposition of non-prosecution (Seoul District Prosecutors’ Office No. 33839, 2019, hereinafter referred to as “related”).