logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2015.11.24 2015고단455
배임수재등
Text

1. Defendant A

(a) The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years;

B. 187,636,450 won shall be collected from the Defendant.

(c).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A, as an employee of the Agricultural Cooperative Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. (FFFF) Co., Ltd. (FFFF) Co., Ltd., Defendant A, as an employee of the Agricultural Cooperative Co., Ltd. (FFF) Co., Ltd., and a person in charge of the duties related to the supply of agricultural products to the local co., Ltd., and the supply of agricultural products to J.

1. Since Defendant A was in charge of the business of allocating the quantities of agricultural products supplied to J in the agricultural economic branch from around 2007 to the present date to the local agricultural cooperatives, Defendant A had a duty to perform duties fairly and in accordance with the procedures set out in the agricultural economic branch owner, thereby creating an interest in the agricultural economic branch.

Nevertheless, around July 3, 2011, the Defendant received KRW 6 million in total from 36 times, as indicated in attached Table 1-1, from around 201 to November 29, 2014, in exchange for an illegal solicitation from the director L from the head of the economic office of K Agricultural Cooperatives (hereinafter “KFF”) to provide large-scale agricultural products, such as apology, to J, and received KRW 6 million in the account of the National Bank in the name of M, a borrowed account used by the Defendant, from around that time, to November 29, 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property in exchange for illegal solicitation in relation to his duties.

2. Around 2012, Defendant A conspiredd to embezzled the NAF funds by manipulating the volume of NA and agricultural products, a director in charge of the NAF’s Economic Office, in agricultural economic branch owners, by paying the agricultural products to NAF more than the actual amount and receiving the false amount from NAF funds as a borrowed account.

Although the Defendant, as an employee of the Nonghyup Economic Community Co., Ltd., had the duty to maintain and preserve the property of the Nonghyup Economic Community, the Defendant, in violation of such duty, remitted agricultural products purchased from the Nonghyup Economic Community around October 30, 2012, to the Nonghyup, the amount of agricultural products less than the actual amount, and 6,000,000,000, which is the price for false quantity.

arrow