logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.08.25 2015고단3130
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 1,00,000 won.

2. The defendants are above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the business owner of "E" in the place of sexual traffic in Daegu-gu D, and Defendant B is the owner of the above "E".

1. From June 28, 2014 to December 21, 2014, Defendant A engaged in an act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. with the Defendant’s sexual intercourse at the said business establishment by having the said business start an act of arranging sexual intercourse between the said business establishment and the said business establishment by having the male in the middle-gu, Daegu-gu, as well as the first and third floor above the third floor above the ground, and the third floor above, the Defendant engaged in an act of arranging sexual traffic, etc.

2. At the time and place indicated in the above paragraph (1), the Defendant, despite being aware that the above three-story buildings owned by the Defendant were provided for sexual traffic, was to receive KRW 1,00,000 as the monthly rent, and the Defendant’s act of arranging sexual traffic was conducted by leasing the above buildings to A.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol of F and H:

1. Written statements of J and K;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs and full certificates of registered matters;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, respectively, of the provisional payment order;

1. In favorable circumstances: Defendant A - No one time before and after a fine is imposed, and the husband’s ex post facto economic difficulties are likely to result in the instant crime; the extent of his/her participation in the instant crime is more severe than that of his/her business owner, and one time before and after the same fine is imposed.

2. In favorable circumstances: Defendant B- The lease of a place to provide sexual traffic, which has no record of reflect, fine, and criminal punishment on two occasions, and which has relatively unhulled rice - unfavorable circumstances: A previous fine of the same kind and a single time;

3. Other.

arrow