1. The defendant received KRW 49,250,000 from the plaintiff and simultaneously received KRW 49,250,000 from the plaintiff the first floor of the real estate stated in the attached Table.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a regional housing association that has its business implementation zone of Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and is the owner of the real estate indicated in the attached Table (hereinafter “instant building”).

나. 주식회사 D( 이하 ‘D’ 이라 한다) 은 2016. 12. 29. 피고와 사이에 이 사건 건물 중 별지 도면 표시 ㄱ, ㄴ, ㄷ, ㄹ, ㄱ의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㈎ 부분 27㎡( 이하 ‘ 이 사건 임차부분’ 이라 한다 )에 관하여 임대차 보증금 50,000,000원, 월 차임 150,000원, 임대차기간 2016. 12. 29.부터 2017. 5. 10.까지로 정하여 피고에게 임대하는 내용의 임대차계약을 체결하였는데( 이하 ‘ 이 사건 임대차계약’ 이라 한다), 특약사항에서 ‘ 본 임차건물은 지역주택조합사업이 진행되는 지역으로 사업 진행에 따른 이주가 필요할 시에 한하여 임차인은 조건 없이 이주 통지 후 3개월 이내 이주한다’ 고 약정하였다.

(c)

On April 9, 2019, the Plaintiff received reimbursement from D for the instant building, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on April 10, 2019, and succeeded to the status of the lessor under the instant lease contract of D.

(d)

On August 9, 2019, the Plaintiff entered into the Defendant “to refuse to renew the contract and move according to the progress of the regional housing association project,” but the Defendant has occupied the leased portion up to now and has not complied with it.

E. The Defendant did not pay a total of five months from June 2020 to October 2020.

【Ground of recognition】 The non-contentious facts, Gap's entries in Gap's evidence 1 through 3 (including various numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination:

A. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the lease contract of this case was lawfully terminated at the expiration of the period at the time of the conclusion of the argument of this case and upon the plaintiff's request for resettlement. Thus, the defendant is obligated to deliver the leased part of this

On the other hand.