logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.08.23 2018구합82137
장기요양급여비용 환수처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff is a person who operates the “C” (hereinafter “instant long-term care institution”) under Article 31 of the Act on Long-Term Care Insurance for the Aged of Older Persons (hereinafter “the instant long-term care institution”) as a sanatorium for older persons under Article 34(1)1 of the Welfare of Older Persons

From July 2, 2018 to July 5, 2018, the Defendant conducted an on-site investigation as to whether the instant long-term care institution’s claim for expenses for long-term care benefits is appropriate, along with the astronomical market.

(hereinafter “instant on-site investigation.” On October 4, 2018 based on the result of the instant on-site investigation, the Defendant rendered a decision to recover the amount pursuant to Article 43 of the Act on Long-Term Care Insurance for the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Act”) on the grounds that the Plaintiff was unfairly claimed and paid KRW 51,546,600 for expenses for long-term care benefits as follows:

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). 1. A claim (hereinafter “instant disposition”) violating the standards for placement of human resources (H13, 6,831,440 won in total) was received each of the expenses for long-term care benefits in violation of the standards for placement of human resources (from August 26, 2013 to October 12, 2016; 2 from January 9, 2017 to October 31, 2017; and (3) as if a caregiver performed the duties of each custodian during the said period, he/she reported to the Defendant as if he/she performed the duties of caregiver upon meeting the monthly standard working hours; and (4) October 2016 [15.3 working persons (4.37%) and October 2017 [17.82 working persons (0.98%) compared to the number of compulsory working personnel];

2. A claim that violates the criteria for additional placement of human resources (H15, total 44,610,310 won);

A. D. Although performing the duties of each custodian from August 26, 2013 to October 12, 2016, and (2) from January 9, 2017 to October 31, 2017, D, as if a caregiver had performed the duties of caregiver for each of the above periods, he/she shall report to the Defendant as if he/she performed the duties of caregiver by meeting the monthly standard working hours as a caregiver for each of the above periods, and as if he/she performed the duties of caregiver, from May 2015 to May 2016, 2016, May 7, 2016, 2016, May 7, 2016, August 8, 2016, October, 2017, respectively.

arrow