beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 25,341,565 as well as 5% per annum from November 28, 2011 to January 27, 2015 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The facts of recognition [the grounds for recognition: (a) the defendant is the vehicle X-ray (hereinafter referred to as “the instant vehicle”) between B and C, in which there is no dispute; (b) Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4; (c) Gap evidence Nos. 6, 7; and Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 5 (including those with serial numbers); and (c) the purport of the whole pleadings
2) On November 28, 201, 201, B is an insurer which entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the vehicle. A) On the two-lanes in order to turn to the left from the 18-2-lane of the 18-2-lane of the Seoyangyang-dong, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, to turn to the military automatic preventive surface from the 4-lane of the 18-2-lane of the 4-lane, and in order to go to the military automatic preventive surface, the driver of the vehicle changed the course to the two-lanes. In such a case, the driver of the vehicle was negligent in notifying the direction change, etc. in advance, taking into account the traffic situation of the front and rear left, while neglecting the duty of care to change the two-lanes to the right side of the vehicle, without examining the traffic situation of the front and rear left side, without changing the two-lanes of the vehicle from the right side to the right side of the vehicle, and caused the Plaintiff's injury to the motor vehicle.
3. The Plaintiff received emergency treatment at the National University Hospital on November 28, 2011 due to the instant accident, and was hospitalized until March 13, 2012 when transferred to the E Hospital on November 29, 201, and received the treatment by no later than March 13, 2012. During that period, the Plaintiff received cardio-divating and anti-divating surgery on the non-divatium during the period from March 13, 2012 to June 7, 2012, and was hospitalized at F Council members.
B. The plaintiff's assertion is the insurer of the automobile of this case who shocked the plaintiff, and is obligated to compensate the plaintiff for the damages incurred in relation to the accident of this case.