A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is living alone on the fourth floor of the building located in Nam-gu Busan Metropolitan City, and his family is living on the third floor of the same building.

Although the Defendant became aware of the occurrence of a child between male-child families and not only male-child families but also male-child families, even though he/she was aware of about two years after around December 2016, the Defendant did not speak of his/her pregnancy and did not prepare for childbirth even though he/she had 2 weeks before the scheduled date of delivery.

around 12:00 on March 6, 2017, the Defendant gave birth to a mixed baby without a hospital even though the Defendant sleeped a serious slick on the fourth floor of the above building, and the Defendant was aware of umba in cosmetic, which was the marba.

It is difficult to see whether the family members of the son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to death certificates, variable photographs, medical records (A), report on internal death (with respect to the opinions of autopsy by a State and a law officer);

1. According to Article 251 of the Criminal Code of the relevant criminal facts, the life of a person on the grounds of sentencing of Article 251 of the Act is an absolute value to be protected. The life of a child born on the side cannot be an exception. The crime of this case is an unfavorable circumstance where the mother, who is responsible for protecting the victim immediately after the birth of the defendant, killed the victim by taking a brue, and the nature of the crime is very bad, and the brue is deemed to have been inflicted in the process of taking the brue.

However, the defendant's acknowledgement of the facts charged is seriously against the defendant, and the crime of this case was committed under extreme confusion after childbirth.