(영문) 창원지방법원통영지원 2020.08.25 2020가단10762

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원통영지원 2020.08.25 2020가단10762

차임 등 청구의 소

Text

1. Defendant C to the Plaintiff Association

(a) 109,200,000 won and the interest thereon from March 3, 2020 to the day of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 17, 2016, the Defendants entered into a lease agreement with respect to the real estate listed in the separate sheet as follows, and operate a helicopter in the said real estate:

The Plaintiff, from October 17, 2016 to January 16, 2019, as the monthly rent deposit (excluding value-added tax) deposit for the lessee of the family room, shall be the Plaintiff, from October 17, 2016 to January 16, 2019, KRW 10 million,000,000,000.

2. The Plaintiff: (a) the amount of KRW 30 million, which was KRW 30 million by the Defendant G H H I T C

1. The plaintiff in the amount of KRW 10 million,00,000,000,000,000,000 won

2.(b)

As of January 16, 2020, 38,500 won in the case of Defendant D E, G, H, and I, 109,200 won in the case of Defendant C, and 38,50,000 won in the case of Defendant C K.

C. (1) On February 26, 2019, the credit assignment (F) transferred to Plaintiff B the monthly rent claim related to the foregoing E, and the claim of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent on July 31, 2020, and notified Defendant D of the assignment of the claim.

(2) On February 21, 2019, J transferred the Plaintiff A’s claim for monthly rent related to the foregoing 202, 203, and I, and the claim for unjust enrichment equivalent to rent on July 31, 2020, and notified the Defendant C of the assignment of claim.

(3) On February 26, 2019, the LAF transferred the claim for monthly rent related to the above K, and the claim for unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent on July 31, 2020 to the Plaintiff B, and notified the Defendant C of the assignment of the claim.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 10 each entry (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. According to the above findings of the determination as to the cause of the claim, a lessee of each of the above lease agreements is obligated to pay to the assignee of the claim for unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent or rent of the leased object in question by the date on which the lessee’s possession of the leased object is terminated.

B. Determination as to the Defendants’ assertion (1) The Defendants are in arrears.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2021.02.16 2020가단23422

-서울동부지방법원 2018.10.19 2018가단5554

-수원지방법원성남지원 2015.12.10 2015가단23658

-대구지방법원김천지원 2017.05.31 2016가단34522

-부산지방법원서부지원 2020.12.22 2019가단10376