1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 19, 2016, G, an agent, driven a HBA car (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) around 23:27, and met with the front 48 national highway in front of the entrance of the J college located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, as one-lane, at the intervals of strengthening from Kimpo-si, one-lane in the front side of the Defendant vehicle and the front side of the two-lane driving of K (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”) driving a two-wheeled by changing the vehicle from three-lane opposite to the direction of the road driving, to one-lane, while driving the vehicle in line with Kimpo-si, and driving the vehicle in line (hereinafter “the instant accident”). As a result, the Deceased caused the death of the horse due to the death of the horse: (a) on May 30, 2017.

B. The Deceased died of all unmarried parents, and the Plaintiffs are siblings of the Deceased, and the Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Defendant vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 4, 15, 18, Eul evidence 1 (including provisional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

가. 주장 원고들은, 원고 차량이 피고 차량의 우측 전방에서 도로를 횡단하기 위하여 하향사선횡단(↙)방향으로 진행하였는데, 피고 차량 운전자가 차량 전조등, 차폭등, 미등 등 자동차 등화장치를 작동하지 않은 채로 운전하며 전방 및 우측 측방 주시의무를 다하지 아니한 것이 이 사건 사고의 원인이 되었으므로 피고는 원고들에게 이 사건 사고로 망인 및 원고들이 입은 손해를 배상할 의무가 있다고 주장한다.

On the other hand, the defendant asserts that the accident in this case is an force majeure accident caused by the death's total mistake, and thus, the liability for damages cannot be recognized.

B. According to the main sentence of Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the automobile is for one’s own sake.