logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.10.08 2014고단1308
강제추행
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Around 05:00 on January 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol in the front of the 207 Hyundai Apartment-dong, Youngdong, Youngpo-gu, Seoul; (b) was able to prevent the said vehicle from driving on the back seat; and (c) was able to use the parts of the vehicle, such as the passenger C (n, 23 years old) who was on the back seat and was on the back seat, and was able to use the back seat as his hand; (d) the victim’s buckbuck site was met; and (e) the victim’s bucks were bucked into the part of the victim; and (e) the victim’s bucks were bucked into the part of the passenger; and (e) the victim’s bucked into the part.

2. The judgment is based on the evidence consistent with the facts charged in this case and there is a victim C's investigation agency and court statement. C stated that the defendant, C, and D were indecent acts such as the facts charged in this case at the rear seat of the defendant inside the taxi between the defendant, C, and D when the defendant, C, and D were on the taxi and arrived at the parking lot of Yeongdeungpo-gu Council to move to the police station after the defendant and the taxi engineer D were on the cab. However, while the victim was under the influence of alcohol at the time, while he was under the influence of alcohol, he was unable to completely memory the fact that he was on board the taxi while he was on board the taxi at the time, and D was on the front seat of the cab, and the defendant was on the move to the back seat, and it is contrary to C's statement by the defendant, and it is difficult to find that there is no other evidence to prove that there was an indecent act or an indecent act on the part of the defendant during the first parking lot from Yeongdeungpo-gu Council.

3. The conclusion is that this part of the facts charged constitutes a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the defendant is the defendant under the latter part of Article 325

arrow