A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 26, 2017, around 09:20, the Defendant tried to see the victim as drinking on the ground that the victim C (85 years of age) was a tree cuter, while she had a horse or dispute with a nearby residents who had 76 U.S. apartment 14 Dong-ro, Nam-gu, Incheon. On June 26, 2017, the Defendant tried to see the victim's body by putting the victim's body under the defendant's clothes and then putting the victim's body over the floor by putting the victim's hand, and then putting the victim's body over the floor for about 56 days in need of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. Analysis of A or C Assault images;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 262 of the Criminal Act, Articles 260 (1) and 260 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on orders to attend lectures and orders to provide community service;

1. Extent of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended sentence] the aggravated area (six months to three years) (the person causing violence or injury) (the person causing special aggravated punishment) shall be injured (the person causing violence or injury).

2. In light of the following circumstances: (a) the degree of the injury suffered by the victim subject to the determination of the sentence was significant; (b) the injury recovery or agreement has not been reached; (c) there was no evidence of criminal punishment other than once a fine of double-class; (d) the gravity of the Defendant’s use of force was relatively more severe than that of the Defendant; (c) the fact that the Defendant did not actually engage in an inspection of personal information for deposit; (d) the fact that the Defendant made efforts to recover damage, such as making an application for inspection of personal information, was considered as favorable circumstances; and (e) the sentence is to be determined as ordered in consideration of various sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and circumstance, and circumstances after the commission of the crime.