logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2017.06.07 2017고단400
교통사고처리특례법위반(치사)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a truck truck truck truck driver.

On December 9, 2016, around 06:10 on December 9, 2016, the Defendant, along with two lanes, continued to run a two-lane 2nd line from the parallel parallel to the parallel parallel at a distance of about 30km from the parallel parallel at the end of 269.6km.

At the same time, there was a lot of time in the morning, and there was a prohibition area for the change of the lane with a white solid line. On the front side, there were accidents that occurred, and many people, such as police officers, etc., have been doing accident handling, and they have been making a manual by reducing speed on the side and giving caution to driving on the side, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to observe the vehicle line, to ensure that a person engaged in driving service has the duty of care to prevent accidents by driving the vehicle more safely than on the front side and the right and the right and the right, and to prevent accidents by driving the vehicle more safely than on the road

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not properly look at the front section and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right are rapidly changed from the second lane to the first lane, and the Defendant was driving normally with the last two lanes due to the negligence.

E received the front part of the front part of the truck's right side, which the Defendant drives, from the upper part of the truck's upper part, and therefore, the truck was able to receive the victim G(51) of police officers (51) who arranged the accident scene by reception near the side of the road, when the truck became centered toward the side by getting the center divided, getting the center divided.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to the above occupational negligence by cutting down the body at the site.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to E and H;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. A death certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing accident scene photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and Articles 3 (1) and 268 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment;

1. The Criminal Act, the suspension of execution;

arrow