logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.06.02 2016노1491
재물손괴
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, as stated in the instant facts charged, did not have destroyed the part of the victim’s ozone part completely with the repair cost by putting the victim’s flab, which was installed, by putting the flab, and destroying the 100,000 won.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court (500,000 won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. (i) The judgment of the court below on the assertion of mistake of fact in the facts charged of this case was made by the injured party in the investigative agency and court to the front part of the right side of the Obato in this case, and the amount of 10,000 won was accepted.

The facts charged in the instant case are consistently stated and, in light of the CD images taken in the instant case, found guilty on the grounds that the facts charged are acceptable.

On April 20, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 06:20 on the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si; (b) on the ground that the victim D uses part of the land owned by the Defendant as a passage through the passage of the Defendant; and (c) on the ground that the victim D uses it as a passage, the Defendant “I am fech fech, drumd with stone on the south land, and is going as a way.”

“Around 100,000 won, the part of the victim’s Obane was entirely damaged so that the 100,000 won of the repair cost can be turned down by putting down the obbane installed by the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property and harmed its utility.

The following circumstances can be acknowledged according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below.

(1) According to CCTV images, if the defendant gets off or gets out of the back of the part of the person presumed to be the defendant (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant"), the defendant gets off of the part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part and the victim of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part on several occasions.

arrow