Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On November 19, 2015, the Defendant, at the office of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Dapo-si, 404, 405, and some of the owners of the victim D and the above commercial buildings, talked about the actual increase in the loan certificates on October 25, 2005, stating that the Defendant borrowed KRW 5 million from E Co., Ltd. as the construction cost for the prevention of the above commercial rooftop, with the victim D and the above commercial owners, and the Defendant borrowed KRW 5 million from E Co., Ltd. operated by the victim, which was the fact that the victim did not forge the above loan certificate, but the victim was not forged

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

[In light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant, who was the president of the above shopping district around October 2005, was wanting to be selected as the management service company of the above shopping district building.

Around November 19, 2015, the Defendant borrowed KRW 5 million from the injured party, who is the operator of E-company, as the construction cost for the prevention of the above commercial rooftop, and delivered to the victim with the official seal of the chairman of the above commercialization center, which was kept in the office, etc. prepared by the victim at that time. ② At the time of November 19, 2015, the Defendant used the above loan certificate to the effect that the injured party was a true document prepared between the injured party and the Defendant, and the Defendant was not aware of the forgery of the above loan certificate. However, the question is repeated as to whether the above loan certificate was forged or not.”

fake.

It is recognized that the answer " shall be in accordance with forgery."

Therefore, it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant had dolusent intention and defames the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, F and G;

1. The defendant;