Of the judgment of the first instance and the judgment of the second instance, the part on Defendant A, B, and F, and the third judgment on Defendant C Q, CR, and B.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the first original judgment (one year and six months of imprisonment) against Defendant BJ (unfair punishment) is too unreasonable.

B. The punishment of imprisonment (two years of imprisonment) and that of the fourth judgment of the court of first instance (four months of imprisonment) against Defendant BK (unfair punishment) is too unreasonable.

C. Defendant A (1) misunderstanding of facts, Y, and AC-related crimes (Article 2015 order 8334 of the lower judgment)

2.(a)

B. Paragraph B is an offense led by B. Although there is no fact that the Defendant was involved, the judgment of the court of the second instance which convicted him of this part of the facts charged by the statement of Y, AC and B contains an error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts. (2) The punishment of the court of the second instance (two years of imprisonment) and that of the court of the fourth (one year and two months of imprisonment) on the Defendant is too unreasonable. (d) The two years of the court of the second instance (five years of imprisonment) on the Defendant B (two years of imprisonment), the third court of the original judgment (two years of imprisonment) and the fourth court of the first instance (one year and two months of imprisonment), are too unreasonable. (e) The two years of the court of the second instance on the Defendant’s imprisonment (two years of imprisonment), which is too unfair. The court of the court of the second instance on the Defendant’s imprisonment with prison labor (two years of imprisonment with prison labor) is too unfair.