Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, each of the defendants B.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the spouse of D, who is the owner of the vehicle with C, and the defendant A was the owner of the vehicle with C, and the defendant A was the owner of the vehicle, and the defendant was the owner of the F restaurant located in E on January 6, 2020 at the F restaurant located in E on January 6, 2020, together with two defendant A's company fees, and the drinking was performed after drinking. At around 20:20 on the same day, the driver was not a substitute driver and moved the vehicle to the parking lot prior to the H association shock point in G at the time of drinking.

1. Defendant A

A. On January 6, 2020, at around 20:30, the Defendant driven a Chand car with a blood alcohol concentration of about 2.9 km from the section of approximately 2.9 km to the road front of a bus comprehensive bus terminal, which is located in G at the time of leisure from the parking lot front of the H association shocking point in G at the time of leisure to the number of shares at the time of leisure.

B. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are those who are engaged in driving a motor vehicle with Cents.

The defendant at around 20:30 on January 6, 2020 above A.

As in the case of paragraph 1, three-lane crossings in front of the credit comprehensive bus terminal in the ambling ambling 0.116% of the blood alcohol concentration was driven from the ambri ginseng distance to the raw ginseng distance.

In this case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the new code because the signal, etc. is installed and operated normally.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded as it is in contravention of the electric red signal and was driven by the victim I (Nam, 28 years old) who was normally done under the new code from the right side of the proceeding direction to the left side and was driven by the Defendant as the front part of the said car operated by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim.