logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.07.13 2017나52083
공사대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) the “satisfy production” in Section 12 of Section 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be taken into consideration as the “production of steel-processed products”; and (b) the additional documents submitted in the court of first instance, which lack to recognize the defendant's assertion, are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the defendant's assertion is rejected; and (c) it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. If so, the decision of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow