All of the appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants and Defendant A are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In full view of the evidence submitted by the prosecution of mistake of facts, although Defendant B could sufficiently recognize the fact that Defendant B inflicted an injury on the victim A by assaulting twice, the judgment of the court below acquitted the Defendant of this part of the facts charged, which affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts. 2) The sentence (2 million won of a fine) sentenced by the court of unfair sentencing to Defendant A is too uneased and unreasonable.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court to Defendant A is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On September 19, 2014, at least 09:10 on September 19, 2014, Defendant B made a statement at the victim A, the victim A and the victim A and the victim B were placed in the front and rear road of the F-gu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, about 09:10, and the victim A were placed at two times and two times at the right floor, and the victim A expressed a bath at the above place at the same 11:00 on the same day, the victim A’s face was taken at the time of the victim’s face, and the victim was sent to the victim, and the victim was not taken the left-hand side for two weeks medical treatment. 2) The lower court determined that the victim A, H (A’s wife), K’s investigation agency, and the lower court’s testimony at each investigation agency, which are consistent with this part of the facts charged, are difficult to recognize the victim A and the victim’s testimony at each investigation agency and the lower court’s latter part of the charges.

However, in relation to the fact of damage around 09:00 on September 19, 2014, the victim A made a decision on September 19, 2014.