Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 14:00 on September 4, 2013, the Defendant: (a) reported that the victim D, who was a tenant of Pyeongtaek-si 202, filed a lawsuit for the return of security deposit against the Defendant, the head of the household; (b) two appraisers; (c) the victim’s wife, etc. reported, “the governance of corporate fraud; (d) governance; (e) ; (e) ; (e) ; (e) ; (e) ; (e) ; (f) ; (f) ; (f) ; (f) ; (f) ; (f) ; (f) ; (f) ; (f) ; (f) ; (c) ; (f) ; (f) ; (f) ; (f) ; (f) ; (f) ; and (f) ; (f) ; and (f) ; (f) ; and (f) ; (f) ; and (f) ; (f) ; (f) ; (f) ; (f) ; (f) ; (f) ;

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of the USB file statute;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that: (a) the Defendant and the defense counsel have made the same remarks as the Defendant’s criminal facts stated in the judgment; (b) it is merely a mixed standard, and thus did not have an intent to insult

In light of the following circumstances, the Defendant’s voice, the size of the Defendant’s voice recognized by the video stored in the USB file among the evidence in its holding, and the circumstances at the time, it is difficult to see that the Defendant’s bath theory is merely a mixed standard. At the same time, there is a victim, the victim’s wife, and two expert witnesses at the time, and thus public performance is recognized.