beta
Text
Defendant
A A shall be punished by a fine of 4,000,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Defendant
A The above fine shall be imposed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Around April 28, 2014, the Defendant purchased the EM-type 2013 (Defendant A) in the name of F, the Defendant’s wife at the D Sales Store in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, and agreed to pay the principal and interest of the victim’s Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd. by dividing it into 48 months for 48 months, and borrowed the said vehicle in the name of F, and registered the said vehicle in the name of F on May 2, 2014, and registered the mortgage amount of KRW 18.2 million in the name of the victim on the same day.
On July 2014, the Defendant borrowed KRW 5,40,00 from a credit service provider under his/her name in French name, and offered the above vehicle as security, which became the object of the victim’s rights, along with F’s seal impression certificates, and delivered it to the Defendant, thereby hindering the victim’s exercise of rights.
Recognizing the fact that Defendant B, who became aware of the 2016 Highest 3275 (Defendant B), was in need of urgency through the introduction of the branch, Defendant B proposed to the effect that “A vehicle may be provided as security after purchasing the vehicle, and may receive the loan by selling the vehicle,” and Defendant B conspired to receive the loan by using the vehicle after concluding the contract in his name according to the above proposal and selling the vehicle to others.”
G introduced an agency to purchase a vehicle in the name of the Defendant B, and Defendant B entered into a lease contract for the passenger car in the Seo-gu Daejeon on July 3, 2015 at the I branch located in Daejeon, Daejeon, with the introduction of G, and agreed to pay lease fees in 496,300 won per month for 48 months, when entering into a lease contract for the passenger car in the victim Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd., Ltd. with the JJ for the victim Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd.
However, in fact, Defendant B and G not only did not have the intention or ability to pay rent properly, but also provided the leased vehicle to the lender as security, and receive the loan.