beta
Text
1. Defendant D’s KRW 10 million to Plaintiff A, Plaintiff B, and C, respectively, and each of the said money from April 10, 2014.
Reasons
1. Claim against Defendant D
A. A. At around 22:42 on April 9, 2014, F made it possible for Plaintiff A to transmit two copies and one copy of a chest photograph to Plaintiff A, who became aware of through H, a back-of-school route in Ulsan-dong G, Ulsan-gu, Seoul, through a cell phone Kakaooox, “I am good in school life. I am ambry and a half-way photograph. I am ambry. I am ambry.” On April 10, 2014, F was raped with Plaintiff A (hereinafter “I amby”) by threatening-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S. I sports and male park. Around 11:00 on April 10, 2014.
2) Defendant D is F’s father. At the time of the instant tort, Defendant D’s father, while living together with F, who was the second-year student of the 14-year middle school at the time of the instant tort, and F was fully dependent on Defendant D in economic respect.
3) At the time of the instant tort, Plaintiff A was the first-year student of the 12-year-old middle school at the time of the instant tort, and Plaintiff B and C were the parents of Plaintiff A. [The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, Plaintiff A’s evidence No.
B. Determination 1) Defendant D, as the father of F, has the duty to supervise, advise and educate the Plaintiff to adapt to society in a normal condition without committing any unlawful act, and the F committed the instant illegal act by negligence and negligence. Accordingly, Defendant D is liable to compensate the Plaintiffs for damages incurred by the instant illegal act pursuant to Article 750 of the Civil Act. (2) The Plaintiffs suffered from mental suffering due to the instant illegal act. However, in consideration of various circumstances, including the content and circumstances of the instant illegal act, the Plaintiff and F, the age of the Plaintiff and F, and the relationship between the Plaintiffs, the consolation money shall be determined as KRW 10 million with respect to the Plaintiff, and KRW 5 million, respectively.
Accordingly, Defendant D raises an objection against each of the above amounts of KRW 10 million against Plaintiff A, Plaintiff B, and C, respectively.