logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.12.16 2014나2051853
매매대금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the part of Article 2-B (No. 7, No. 20, No. 11, No. 10) of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (No. 7, No. 20, No. 11, No. 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance) is as follows 2

2. The part of the first instance court's decision [the part 2-b(2)(2-b)(2-2(b)(20-20-20-11-2) of the first instance court's decision)] 1.B. 1] 1. each of the evidence listed above, Gap evidence 18, Eul evidence 21-21, Eul evidence 17,20-21-21, and part of the testimony of the first instance court and the first instance court's witness M and F's testimony as a whole. In other words, under the circumstance where it is unclear whether the agreement of this case was approved by the Korean Supreme Court, it is difficult to conclude that the agreement of this case was concluded between G and the owner of the land within the development zone's own signature and seal it is difficult for the Plaintiffs to separately conclude that the agreement of this case was concluded between G and the owner of the land within the development zone's 20-20-3). It is difficult to conclude that the agreement was concluded between G and the owner of the same land.

arrow