logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2015.06.16 2015재고단4
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Seized evidence 1 or 2 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 13, 1989, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Ulsan District Court, 2 years from the suspension of the execution of August 8, 200, 1 year from the Changwon District Court, on February 2, 200, and on November 27, 2001, from the Changwon District Court, to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) at the Changwon District Court on April 13, 2006, and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime at the same court on April 13, 2006, and completed the execution of the sentence by the Seocheon District Court on December 3, 2009, for three years from imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) at the Gangwon Branch Branch Branch of the North Korean District Court on September 7, 2012.

The defendant used the DNA XG vehicle in the name of the mother C in order to steal the property by gathering the area of Jeonnam, Jeonbuk, Chungcheongnamnam, Chungcheongnamnam, and Gyeongnam-nam rural community, and by impairing another person's residence.

At around 15:00 on February 22, 2014, the Defendant, at the residence of the victim F in Go Chang-gun E, opened a gate that has not been corrected and intruded into the inner bank, and then, the Defendant stolen precious metal products worth KRW 3,90,000,000 in total of market prices, including one gold sheet, one gold sheet, one gold sheet, one half sheet, and one half sheet.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Each investigation report (16 pages, 37 pages, 39 pages, 51 pages, 212 pages);

1. Materials concerning the current status of occurrence of theft incidents against suspects and sacitys;

1. Suppressions with on-site and documentary evidence;

1. Records of seizure, list of seizure, photographs, etc. of seized articles;

1. Before judgment: References to criminal records, references to criminal records, reports on results of confirmation before disposition, investigation reports (verification between suspects A and repeated crimes), and investigation reports (report attached to judgment);

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the frequency of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the repeated crimes of the same kind in the judgment;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow