A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 9, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding the disturbance between about 30 minutes on the ground of the empty disease outside the restaurant, which was located outside the restaurant, while drinking alcoholic beverages in the D cafeteria operated by the victim C, Seo-gu, U.S., Seo-gu, Busan at around 02:00. The Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement E and C;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do1448, Apr. 1, 1995; 201Do119, Apr. 1, 201; 201Do1336, Apr. 1, 20