Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The relation between the parties (1) around 1968, the defendant established and operated a private fire extinguishing shooting range in the Army B (hereinafter “the private fire extinguishing shooting range in this case”), from around 1979, the public fire extinguishing shooting range in the Army B military units (hereinafter “the public fire extinguishing shooting range in this case”), and the private fire extinguishing shooting range in the case of this case (hereinafter “the private fire extinguishing shooting range in this case”).
(2) The Plaintiffs are residents living in the vicinity of the instant shooting range.
B. Training conditions at the instant shooting range from 2013 to 2017: 147 to 178 days - shooting range: 16 units: K-1/K-2 gun and gun shooting range (it shall be used for 6 shooting range from 2016 to 2017) - Two-4 times per week (it shall be located 15-44 lines from 2013 to 2017: 20-1 shooting ranges; 21-21-22 times per hour per hour per hour per day per day per day per day per day per day; 30-1-2 times per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day; 20-1-3 times per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day per day; 3-20-20-10-16-K shooting range per day per day per day