The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for one year, confiscation, collection of penalty) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court rendered a sentence by taking account of the following factors: (a) the Defendant led to the confession and reflect of the instant crime; (b) the commission of the crime on March 25, 2019, under favorable circumstances that may be considered in light of the circumstances; (c) the amount of penphonephones possessed by the Defendant was considerable; and (d) the fact that the Defendant committed a second offense even though he had been sentenced three times due to a drug crime; and (c) other factors that were disadvantageous to the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (d) the circumstances after the crime

Even when considering the circumstances alleged by the Defendant as the grounds for appeal, the lower court appears to have determined the punishment within a reasonable scope, sufficiently taking into account all the circumstances regarding sentencing.

Furthermore, there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances to change the sentencing of the lower court after the lower judgment.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act because the defendant's appeal is without merit.