Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 29, 2017, around 17:00, the Defendant damaged property indicated B in the indictment at the parking lot on the Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Nowon-gu, 129, a 129-1, a 129-gil, but the damaged vehicle is a victim. However, the damaged vehicle is registered by C as the final owner on the vehicle registration ledger, and it is recognized that D, a substantial representative of the said company, is actually managing and purchasing the vehicle, and therefore, it is reasonable to deem C as the owner is a stock company.

The fact that the owner of the above vehicle is not B is that it does not affect the defendant's right of defense, so it is changed ex officio to delete the part of the victim as the victim.

In this case, the claim relationship between E 1 ton of cargo clater E, which is parked with a loan from B B, has been cut off the front glass of the cargo clater, and the front and rear glass clater in cement brick, and damaged the other's property by destroying the windows so that the repairing cost of approximately KRW 700,000 can be broken.

2. The Defendant: (a) opened the fix of the cargo vehicle at the time and place specified in paragraph 1; (b) taken the head debt of the above victim B, seated in the auxiliary seat, out of the vehicle; (c) taken the head debt of the above victim B out of the vehicle; and (d) taken the head part of the victim’s head, which is fluorized in the road, and fluored up twice on the road with the fluoring part of the victim’s head, and fluored up approximately 1-2 cm, and fluor

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Investigation report (report on the change of disposition as an injury crime);

1. Each internal investigation report, damaged photographs, etc., a photograph of CCTV to capture the crime prevention CCTV, and a vehicle repair estimate (the defendant was permitted to do any act incidental to a glass window from D, the owner of the vehicle;

However, the fact that the vehicle was damaged as above was anticipated and acceptable by D.

It is difficult to see it]

Application of Statutes

1..