1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

(a) Indication of attached real estate;

2. Removal of the buildings to be entered, and the same indication; and

1. The description;

1. On July 6, 2015, the Plaintiffs indicated that the land indicated in the order was leased to the Defendant as KRW 200,000,000 for lease deposit, from August 10, 2015 to August 9, 2018, and KRW 25,00,000 for rent monthly (value-added tax classification, and advance payment on the 10th day of each month).

At the time of the conclusion of the above lease agreement, the Plaintiffs and the Defendant, upon a special agreement, can terminate the above lease agreement if the delayed amount of the rent exceeds the two-term rent. In the event the Defendant delivers the above land to the Plaintiffs due to the termination or expiration of the lease term, the Plaintiffs were to remove all the building indicated in the order and the appurtenances attached thereto and restore the said land

While the Defendant constructed a housing exhibition hall on the above land and occupied the above land, the Defendant was in arrears for at least two months from March 10, 2016, and the Plaintiffs were in arrears by serving a copy of the instant complaint on the said land, and the said lease contract is terminated on the ground that at least two times the Defendant was in arrears.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to remove the above building on the land and deliver the above land to the plaintiffs, and pay the overdue rent and unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent.

2. Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts (Judgment without holding any pleadings due to the failure to submit a reply);