logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.03.27 2015고합50
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On September 25, 2003, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Seoul Central District Court. On October 13, 2005, the Daegu District Court sentenced the Defendant to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes. On January 8, 2008, the Busan District Court sentenced the Defendant to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes. On March 19, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in the same court and completed the execution thereof in the first prison of the North

【Criminal Facts】

On January 12, 2015, the Defendant, at around 17:26, committed a theft of another person’s property worth KRW 8,720,000, total market price from around September 2014 to the above date, including the theft by inserting one 18K cmp in the market price of the victim’s possession on the display stand, which was located on the display stand, by taking advantage of the gaps in which the victim’s attention was neglected, and by inserting one cm in the display stand stand, from around 17:26, 201 to the above date.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Photographs photographs of text on a mobile phone, photographs of damaged objects, and photographs of each CCTV to capture, photographs of each purchase account book, and copies of case records;

1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: Criminal history records, references to investigation reports (A), three copies of the judgment, and one copy of the personal confinement status;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the method and frequency of crimes, and the planned and repeated crimes of the same kind in the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 332 of the Criminal Act and Articles 332 and 329 of the Criminal Act (with regard to habitual larceny) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Reasons for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment for one month to 18 years; and

2. Sentence;

arrow