Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B Co., Ltd. is a corporation that opens a website (D) with the trade name "B" on the Internet on the fourth and fifth floor of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building, and sells online shopping mall, etc., and Defendant A is a joint representative director of the said corporation.

No one shall place an exaggerated advertisement using an experienced machine with regard to the name, manufacturing method, quality, nutrition labelling, ingredients, use, etc. of foods, etc., and shall place no indication or advertisement with a content that may cause mistake or confusion as to efficacy or effect in the prevention and treatment of diseases, or pharmaceutical products or health functional foods.

1. Defendant A

A. From November 16, 2013 to February 27, 2014, the Defendant posted food, etc. sold by the Defendant on the “after-use bulletin board” of the aforementioned website (D), thereby making an exaggerated advertisement using it.

B. The Defendant advertised the “tin” on the above temporary website, which is a food, and posted a notice to the effect or effect on the prevention and treatment of diseases, or that it is likely to mislead or confuse them with pharmaceutical products or health functional foods, by advertising the “Tropical disorder, salutism, salutism, salutism, and chronological salutism,” and “it may assist in the reduction of the pitr, stroke, stroke, heart diseases, and have the effect of infection and infection,” respectively.

2. Defendant B, a representative of the Defendant, committed a violation as described in paragraph (1) in relation to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. E statements;

1. Materials concerning the certification of exaggerated advertisement (to screen each tong);

1. Application of statutes governing certified transcript of corporate register;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Articles 95 subparag. 1 and 13(1) of the Food Sanitation Act.