Defendant

C Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for ten months, for Defendant A and for eight months, for each of the defendants B.

seizure.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C The business owner operating a mutual influoral game room on the D2th floor of Ulsan-gun, the defendant A lent the name at the time of leasing the building on behalf of the above C as an employee of the above game site, and the person in charge of managing the overall game site, and the defendant B was an employee of the game site.

From October 4, 2015 to October 17:3, 2015, the Defendants conspired to set up 21 outdoor game machine 21 units that did not receive the ratings purchased via the Internet in the above game, and provided them to the unspecified number of customers, and the Defendants offered 20,000 to 10% fees for the game and exchange KRW 1 unit of money.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to distribute or use game water which is not classified into rating, and exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A written statement of E, F and G;

1. Police seizure records;

1. On-site enforcement photographs, copies of places of business, copies of seized articles, response to communications data, copies of contracts for lease of real estate, and replies with data verifying communications;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (based on the analysis of monetary content data);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and the Defendants’ choice of punishment: The Defendants: Imprisonment, respectively, under Articles 44(1)2 and 32(1)1 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of providing ungraded game water), Articles 44(1)2 and 32(1)7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 30 of the Criminal Act, and each choice of imprisonment;

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37 and Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: The crime of this case committed by the Defendants on the grounds of sentencing under Article 44(2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act is economical by continuously causing property loss by using users’ speculative spirit.