Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. The Plaintiff, from January 13, 2010, leased 102 of the multi-family house with the second floor in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which was owned by the Defendant, to reside together with his family.
On June 2015, the directors were directors around 2015.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Assertion and determination
A. The plaintiff's assertion shall compensate the plaintiff for the following damages.
1) The Defendant, at the time of the lease agreement with the Plaintiff, was aware that 6.4 million won was likely to enter the above 102 sexual harassment, but in fact, the Plaintiff was not able to enter the Plaintiff’s sexual harassment. As a result, the Plaintiff brought about KRW 40,00 in the cost of KRW 6.4 million, the Defendant shall compensate the Plaintiff for damages of KRW 6.40,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, and KRW 2.3,000,000,000,000,000 won, and KRW 2,30,000,000,000,000,000,00
3) The Defendant, as a lessor, is obligated to maintain the leased object in such a state as may be necessary for the use and profit-making of the leased object (in spite of Article 623 of the Civil Act, as follows, he/she is liable to compensate the Plaintiff
(1) Ansan and medical expenses of KRW 220,80: The Plaintiff and his/her family members were suffering from 102-1,00,000, which the Plaintiff leased due to the Defendant’s failure to repair the worn-out housing and received treatment.
② The Defendant left smoking of the next tenants set forth in the above 102 from October 2013 to September 2014, the Plaintiff was given birth and treatment, due to noise, dust, etc. arising from the new construction works of the next house.
(3) Theft damage 270,000 won: The defendant's locking device despite the plaintiff's continued request.