Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on November 29, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 7, 2016 and is currently under suspended sentence.

[Criminal facts]

1. Joint crimes committed by Defendant A, B, F, and G;

A. The Defendants, who attempted special larceny, committed a special larceny, such as: (a) having invaded upon a restaurant, convenience store, etc. at the new wall time; (b) having the vehicle driven by the Defendant A while carrying other Defendants up to the scene of the crime; and (c) having the network with the Defendant B; (d) having the Defendant G considered the network before the scene of the crime; and (e) having the Defendant F engaged in a theft of property by intrusioning on a restaurant, etc.

Accordingly, on September 11, 2017, at around 02:03, the Defendants came to “J Eart” in the operation of the victim I located in Daejeon Seosung-gu, Daejeon, and Defendant A and Defendant B stopped the vehicle on the front left of the Mat and reported the network within that scope, and Defendant G attempted to steal the property by cutting off the mat door, putting the f in a place where the network was seen before the Mat, and by intrusion upon the Mat door glass, but the mat was attempted to steal the property.

After all, the Defendants jointly attempted to steal the victim's property.

B. On September 11, 2017, the Defendants committed the crime of Sep. 11, 2017, committed the crime at around 03:00 on September 11, 2017, at the “M cafeteria” in the operation of the Victim L, located in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon. Defendant A, B, and Defendant G: (a) with the vehicle parked in the vicinity; (b) with the vehicle’s view to the network inside the nearby vehicle; (c) with the vehicle’s view to damaging the entrance glass; and (d) without the vehicle’s discovery of the property to be stolen, Defendant F, Defendant A, and Defendant B infringed on the vehicle’s back to the said restaurant; and (c) with the vehicle’s order to re-disfit the property that could be stolen, Defendant F, and Defendant G intruded into the said restaurant; and (d) with the market value that