1. As to Defendant B’s KRW 37,00,000, and KRW 7,000 among them, Defendant B shall be from December 31, 2005 to the date of full payment.

1. According to Gap evidence No. 1-1 to No. 4-1 of judgment as to the claim against defendant B, the plaintiff is obligated to pay to the defendant B the amount of KRW 7 million on December 26, 2005; two copies per month; ② the repayment period of KRW 1,00,000 from March 27, 2007 to October 26, 2006; ③ the payment period of KRW 1,000 from October 26, 2006 to 1,00,000 to 2,000 per annum; KRW 1,000 from October 26, 2006 to 2,00 to 1,00,000 per annum; KRW 1,000 to 2,00 per annum; and KRW 1,00 to 2,00,000 to 3,00 per annum; and KRW 2,000 to 2,00 per annum; and

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C

A. The plaintiff asserted by the parties that the defendant Eul is liable to pay the above amount to the plaintiff, and the defendant C is not liable to pay the above amount to the plaintiff, since the interest rate of 10 million won on October 26, 2006 shall be 30% per annum, and the interest rate of 10 million won on May 10, 2006 shall be 24% per annum, and the interest rate of 10 million won shall be 24% per annum. Thus, the defendant C is liable to pay the above amount to the plaintiff, and the defendant shall not be jointly and severally guaranteed each of the loan obligations of this case.

B. The judgment is based on the evidence consistent with the plaintiff's assertion, although the part of the signature and seal of the defendant C in each of the above loan certificates is denied the fact that the defendant C has affixed the signature and seal of the defendant C, and the plaintiff himself has affixed the seal of the defendant C while borrowing money from the plaintiff. The authenticity is not recognized.