The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment without prison labor for not less than four months, one year of suspended execution, and 80 hours of social service) of the lower court is deemed to be too uneasible and unfair;

2. In light of the fact that the Defendant caused the instant accident by negligence that the Defendant neglected his duty of care on the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the duty of care, and thus, caused serious injury to the victim, such as gambling, etc., and the Defendant did not make a serious effort to get a letter to the victim and his family members, it is necessary to

However, in full view of all the sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the fact that the Defendant had no criminal record of imprisonment or heavier, was subscribed to a motor vehicle comprehensive insurance at the time of the accident, the fact that the fault of the victim crossinged by violating the crosswalk signal signal at night is one of the causes of the accident, etc., the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., even if considering the above circumstances, it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

The prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.