A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of a sexual traffic business that is called ‘B' and ‘C'.

The defendant from June 2016 to the same year

8. From the time of September 19, the head of Suwon-si Office Officetel Nos. 1023, 1121, 1219, and 1228: (a) advertised the Internet site “E”, “F”, etc. under the name of “B” and “C”; (b) hires female workers of H et al. through the Internet site G, etc.; and (c) send the advertisement to male customers who reported the advertisement at KRW 150,00,000 to receive the price for sexual traffic at KRW 160,000 and are waiting for female employees.

With regard to sexual intercourse, sexual traffic has been arranged for business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of a police officer in relation to I, J, K, L, M, N,O, or P;

1. Seizure records;

1. A contract for the lease of an officetel with a C advertisement closure and an officetel closure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as field photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act and selection of imprisonment;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended punishment] There is no person who has the basic area (six months to one year and four months) (the special sentencing person] (the sentencing person) of the 2 types of sexual traffic crimes subject to 19 years of age or older, such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic, [the commission, etc. of sexual traffic by taking advantage of the period, scale, method of business, circumstances after the crime was committed] as stated in the judgment, the defendant's attitude of reflectivity and criminal history relation (the criminal punishment has no record of punishment after being punished for violent crimes around November 202) and other records and changes in the sentencing.