The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant may not reproduce the copyright of another person’s program without legitimate authority and infringe the copyright of another person’s program without a legitimate authority.

Nevertheless, the Defendant violated the author’s property right by illegally installing one micro-flodow 7 hold copyright at the computer in the working room of the above company at a time when it is difficult to know the date in which it is unknown.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 136(1)1 of the Copyright Act, which are subject to prosecution subject to complaint under Article 140 of the same Act.

However, according to the records, it is recognized that the complainant who is the above copyright holder has withdrawn the complaint after the indictment of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure