The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The determination of the summary of the grounds for appeal (i.e., a fine of one million won) is unreasonable;

2. The lower court rendered a judgment that maintained the summary order.

The punishment seems to be determined by taking the background of crimes, criminal records, etc. as sentencing factors.

The court below did not err in selecting and applying sentencing factors, and there is no change in sentencing factors in the appellate court.

Although the sentencing criteria do not apply to a case where the defendant requested a formal trial against a summary order, the sentencing criteria are not applied. However, even if this court examines again the sentencing factors and other factors of sentencing which are set forth in the sentencing criteria for the offense of insult, the decision of the original court is unreasonable.

3. The appeal by the defendant is without merit.

The dismissal under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act is dismissed.