The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of the facts, misunderstanding of the legal principles) M M The Prosecutor B stated in the prosecutor’s investigation that, in order to the effect that: (a) A, the principal agent of the above entertainment shop, entered into a substitute contract with the Defendant to provide the instant maternity to the said entertainment shop’s sexual traffic; and (b) through a water, a female employee and male customer stated in detail the process of engaging in sexual traffic.

The prosecutor's statement of female employees S also complies with this, and rather, the statement reversed by the original court of the court of the court below such as B and S is not reliable because its content is unclear.

Since water AJ also purchased a specific water from a water with a specific water and had female employees and male customers, the Defendant knew that MM’s entertainment shop was well aware that M’s use of the above water as a place of sexual traffic.

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant not guilty of the facts charged of this case, which affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding of facts and legal principles.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is the owner of a building on the ground of Busan Metropolitan City’s annual Gu L, and operates a telecom with the trade name “Vel” on the third or sixth floor of the above building (hereinafter “Vel”). A from March 3, 2016, from around the same year, from around March 3, 2016.

9. From the date of February 2, 200, in which the two floors of the above building were leased from the Defendant and 13 female employees provided similarity to male customers at the first place above the same one lane, and the female employees run “M amusement shop” in the manner of “m entertainment shop” with sexual intercourse in the second place within the two-lane radius.

On March 10, 2016, the Defendant leased approximately 633 square meters of the second floor of the above building to A ( approximately 192 square meters) and, at the instant establishment operated by A, the Defendant used one room for 40 minutes when female employees and male customers come to have sexual intercourse.